- Intel burn test gflops and results Ps4#
- Intel burn test gflops and results Pc#
- Intel burn test gflops and results windows#
So I am wondering is there a solution for gflop thing or intel burn test does not give the proper results for fx cpus?Īmd FX-8320 1,356v) (Cpunb 1.27v )(Ht 2400mhz 1.21v)Ĭorsair h60 (idle 30c,load core 56c, load socket 62 c)Ĭorsair Vengeance 1600mhz 2x4gb( c8 1. I am not a gamer, I am especially using this computer to make music, latency and computing power are pretty much importan Anyway I feel the speed of fx-8320 which is pretty much better. Right now it is 2400mhz, but 1100t was able to see 2800 without crashing. In fact, a mid-level GTX 960 runs at 2.3 TFLOPS, while the GTX 1080 at 9 TFLOPS.
Intel burn test gflops and results Pc#
1.8 TFLOPS for a GPU is pretty weak and considered merely 'entry level' in the PC Graphics market.
Intel burn test gflops and results Ps4#
when nb freq is 2600mhz, prime95 and memtest crashes. The PS4 CPU runs at 102.4 GFLOPS, behind the 112GFLOPS of the XBOX One. I can't figure out the problem.īesides I think I am not a newbie(not my first rig) but i cant even oc nb freq to 2600. If you want to bench the system get PCMark 7 which tests everything on your rig, or the 3DMark Vantage which is used by gamers to test CPU and GPU for gaming.Īs far as GFlops and the P67/Z58 Chip Set I can't really help you.This is my first post but I have been checking the forum since I buy crosshair v formula 1.5 years ago.įIrst I had 1100t 圆 and its burn test results were about 70gflops 5 months I have been using its burn test results are about 40 gflops. No one here takes it seriuosly as I have seen more scores fluctuate from not even changing anything.
WEI is garbage and should not even be considered a benchmark. Part of the problem MAY be because i can't run my Ram cards in dual channel, i think i may have a bad board, cant RMA it till i fix my laptop other wise im stuck without a computer for a while I gotta do more research on gflops cause i don't know what that is lulz I currently have it stable 4.5GHz with VCore 1.40v & VTT 1.20vīut i am still getting 105 gflops, not sure what its supposed to be at My processor and ram used to score 7.7 each, now they dropped to 7.6 each, not a big difference, but overclocking is supposed to increase performance not reduce it lulz
Intel burn test gflops and results windows#
Yeah i have notice a performance decrease on running Windows Experience Index Notice how the clock speeds are shown to be at the normal speeds rather then the overclocked speeds? or turbo boost speeds? i forgot what voltages i used for the CPU Vcore on either overclock, but they both are different. Ive never seen the result be anything other than a 3.xxxxx number. It usually requires the electrical and thermal testing of a product, using an expected operating electrical cycle (extreme of operating condition), typically over a time period of 48-168 hours. But still that's a bit low, try adjusting your other parameters like VTT to get your Gflops back up where they should be. A burn-in test specification varies depending on the device and testing standard (military or telecom standards). Part of this can be attributed to the RAM if you changed the RAM multi. Notice you raised the core clock 10 but you only got a 4.5 increase in Gflops.
Ive got a system that passed 250 runs of high IBT with 94 GFlops, but the result was 4.753050e-002 each time. The important part is the test passed and secondary the Gflops. This one was ran with my CPU Overclocked 4.4GHz Intel Burn Test (results meaning) Jump to Latest Follow 1 - 6 of 6 Posts.
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU 3.30GHz
This one was run with my CPU Overclocked 4.0GHz Intel i5 2500k 3.3ghz (3.7ghz Turbo Boost)
0 kommentar(er)
